Tags

.

Search

Entries in change (33)

Thursday
Jul012010

Don’t Mess with Oscar

In today’s super-social society, judgment is passed at the speed of light. Almost as soon as the news breaks, the judgment drops. Whether it be a movie that doesn’t live up to its hype, a celebrity who has been involved in a scandal, or a simple wardrobe malfunction or fashion faux pas, the social media space is teeming with bloggers and Facebookers ready to pounce. Most celebs would be happy to keep Perez Hilton and Harvey Levin at bay; I myself wouldn’t want to upset Oscar Morales.

Morales isn’t a celebrity blogger, fashion expert, business tycoon or anyone else who would typically attract mass attention on the Internet. Morales is an engineer in Colombia. And he had simply had enough.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Jun292010

Reflections on a PR Education

With a daughter heading off to college this fall, I’ve got a lot to reflect on when it comes to career decisions and higher education. I’m ambivalent about the fact that my daughter is pragmatic and has chosen an undergraduate business school over a liberal arts education. Yet a liberal arts education feels like a luxury in these times.

I know when I went to college, I was afforded that luxury, yet I chose the most vocational major I could: journalism.

Wise choice?

In an editing class, I had to memorize the “point” value of each capital letter and small letter in the alphabet, then write a headline that would fit in the layout. A capital M was two points; a capital I was one. Fast-forward to today, and here we are all a-Twitter—and I’m counting characters again. Truly, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Click to read more ...

Friday
Jun252010

Time to Rethink the American Dream?

This week, discouraging news was released about new-home sales in May: The number plummeted 33 percent from April. Now that the government-sponsored $8,000 tax credit for new homebuyers has expired, it seems potential purchasers have cooled their heels on what used to be the staple of the American Dream.

Occasional special credits and longstanding “permanent” tax write-offs such as the deduction of mortgage interest have placed an inherent advantage in owning a home versus renting. The mortgage companies and quasigovernmental housing agencies followed suit, marketing their version of the dream to young professionals by dangling carrots of several-hundred-thousand-dollar “starter homes” to young people with starting-salary incomes and no credit.

For years, marketers across a range of industries have relied on homeownership as a key component when promoting that dream. But should we—as marketers and as Americans—be finding out whether homeownership really matters to young people today or even rethinking its viability as a good investment for many people, young and old? Maybe young people are right not to buy. Is that aspect of the American Dream truly a reality—or even desirable—for them? Should it be?

Click to read more ...

Thursday
Jun242010

The Consumers’ New Clothes (Sarah Ferguson, Take Note)

Originally posted on the Huffington Post.

I don’t need to tell you that the world has seen its share of change lately. We used to embrace change and make it happen (which entails pretty much everything before Sept. 11, 2001). Then we watched it from the sidelines (the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the various financial crises), craved it (the 2008 U.S. presidential election) and circled back to watching—helplessly, it seems (losing patience with President Obama, the BP oil leak).

But now we’re creating change again. A New Consumerism is taking hold. People around the world are realizing their responsibility in current events and trying to take control of what they can. They’re making changes to simplify their finances, their consumption, their lives.

Unfortunately, Sarah Ferguson doesn’t seem to be one of those people

Click to read more ...

Thursday
May202010

Power from the People

Originally posted on huffingtonpost.com.

Look at the American political landscape today and you might begin to get the sinking feeling that the red state/blue state dichotomy is, on the one hand, just a bit of political show and, on the other, a pitiable piece of naiveté. We have to admit that if we want to paint the nation with an election-time metaphor, its color wouldn’t be blue, red or even my recently identified purple. It’s green—and not the green of environmental concerns, but the green of cold, hard cash.*

On Jan. 21, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court virtually endorsed this green-tinted view of American politics in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that corporations (and nonprofits and unions) can donate any amount of money to a political campaign—and at any time, including the previously banned “electioneering” period of 30 days before a primary and 60 days before a general election.

The court essentially opened the floodgates to corporate domination of campaign finance, staking the decision, which reverses six decades of both federal election law and First Amendment jurisprudence, on the notion that corporations are people, too.

Click to read more ...